
As I sit here writing my dissertation, I find that business (undergraduate) Shannon is fighting with social policy (postgraduate) Shannon. Take that in a non-schizophrenic way. I don’t want to go into my dissertation topic in depth for fear that I’ll bore you or lose readers, but suffice it to say that it revolves around the potential of the private sector to fill HIV/AIDS governance gaps in South Africa. A substantial proportion of my literature investigates the power (and limitations) of corporate social responsibility and its potential to actually fill the gaps left by the state.
Corporate Social Responsibility.
I should preface this by saying that I chose this research question because it provided a nexus of sorts; a place where business meets social policy and where my interest in HIV/AIDS finds a comfortable nest. Now, I have studied CSR for years, but this year has presented it in a different capacity. I have been reading now about putting mandates on CSR premised on the idea that voluntary initiatives aren’t enough. The idea is that big TNCs don’t want to really help people (there’s no incentive), so to ensure that rhetoric becomes reality, some legally binding instruments should find their way into the business world and mandate CSR.
Now, Social Policy Shannon understands those lines of thinking — big business has quite an impact on the environments in which they work and often times the impact isn’t entirely (or even slightly) positive. In South Africa, for example, big business has been implicated in furthering the apartheid system. With that in mind, perhaps it is good to make businesses help out; to push them past philanthropy to encourage real social change. As much as I like to think that, Business Shannon keeps coming through; perhaps so many years of discussing the bottom line has dirtied my virgin soul.
How can you mandate CSR?! Not to completely echo Milton Friedman here, but why is it business’ responsibility to help with social change? Sure, I think it sounds like a nice idea, but isn’t it the responsibility of the state to provide social services? Why should a tech organization be mandated to work on social issues? That’s not their job! It’s not as if they’re an NGO that’s intentioned on helping out with these kinds of issues. It seems that civil society pressure has moved off of the state and onto corporations — why is that fair? How is it their responsibility? Sure, I firmly believe that organizations should do no harm and that, where possible, they should provide employees with a wonderful, safe working environment, health benefits, etc. Awesome, awesome, awesome. Again, not to sound too Friedman-esque but doesn’t the idea of mandated CSR run counter to a capitalist society?
Don’t get me wrong — I think CSR has wonderful potential and I do think that it’s important for organizations to get involved. With the impact and power that they have, certainly they should be giving back. To mandate these things, however? I think that’s extreme and unfair.
I’ll have to get back to you on that, though… after finishing my dissertation I might have different thoughts on the issue!
Love from London,

Like this post? Buy me a coffee & support my late-night habits.